But all that Amnesty has proven is that it has no credibility. To Amnesty, bashing Israel is far more important than little details like truth and accuracy.
The Gaza Platform data also includes in many cases the an insulting term for the IDF – it calls the army the “IOF,” or “Israel Occupation forces,” a term used up until now exclusively by Arab media and Arab NGOs. Now Amnesty has adopted that derogatory term as its official terminology, further proving that Amnesty is not an unbiased source.
Amnesty has a halo around it as a reliable, major human rights NGO. Any fair observer, looking at only the evidence I have compiled over the past three days, must conclude that it Amnesty is a travesty.
Every day that they refuse to apologize for and correct this consistent pattern of lies, deception and bias is more proof of that very bias. Newspapers issue corrections, but that is beneath Amnesty.
Amnesty is well aware of my posts which have been tweeted to them hundreds of times, and others including myself have emailed them asking for comment, which they have ignored.
To Amnesty, truth is sometimes just an inconvenience that gets in the way of a good story.
Their donors might be interested in knowing this.
If I am wrong in a single one of my accusations, I invite Amnesty to respond,. I promise to print their response in full.