As reported last week, President Obama has now linked forcing Israeli concessions on a two-state solution to American help with Iran and its nuclear ambitions. The Obama administration is prepared to offer Israel tougher action against Iran’s nuclear program if the Netanyahu government agrees to stop building in East Jerusalem, Judea, and Samaria.
In essence, political blackmail.
This “linkage” underscores Israel’s relative powerlessness in its dialogue with the U.S. Simply put, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no cards to play. Bibi has nothing of value to trade. He has zero leverage. He has nothing to threaten as retaliation.
President Obama’s Chicago-style political hardball has serious implications for Israel. Forcing Israel to “go it alone” with Iran by withholding targeting information, satellite images, over flight permissions, technical help jamming air defenses – and a whole host of other behind-the-scenes assistance – reduces the chance of Israeli military success.
But Obama’s Mafia-style offer “that Israel cannot refuse” also has serious implications for America. And if American voters knew, it is a policy they would reject.
Let me repeat that. American voters would reject a policy of forcing Israel to go it alone.
In a Rasmussen poll this past May, 49 percent of Americans agreed that if Israel launches an attack against Iran, the United States should help Israel. Thirty-seven percent believe the United States should do nothing, while just 2 percent believe the U.S. should help Iran.
Sixty-six percent of respondents said that preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons was more important than preventing war between Iran and Israel. That was up fourteen percentage points (from 52 percent) in July 2008.
Americans understand better than the Obama administration, it seems, that should Israel decide it has no option other than a military strike on Iran, it would be in America’s vital interest that the Israeli strike succeed.
Bibi surely understands that as well. But Bibi has no cards to play. In the face of political blackmail on a vital issue such as Iran, he can only retreat inch by inch and hope for better ground to defend. Without leverage, Netanyahu is forced to bargain away the Jewish claim to Judea and Samaria while hoping to keep a tenuous hold on an undivided Jerusalem.
Caroline Glick is right when she says of the Israeli negotiating position, “The game is rigged against us.”
But here in America we can apply the ultimate political leverage – the American voter – to put some cards in Bibi’s hand.
We can use those poll numbers of American support and common sense as a platform to launch a national campaign designed to break the linkage between two-state and American help on Iran.
We can remind American voters why, absent of the world preventing a nuclear Iran, Israel might be forced to make the difficult choice of a military strike as a means of self-defense.
And we can send this message through the American voter to President Obama: It is in the vital national interest of the United States that any Israeli military strike succeed. Don’t deny Israel the help it needs as part of your diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East. Should it come down to a military strike, help Israel succeed. The world – and the U.S. – will be better for it.
Without a concerted, national campaign in America, without a campaign that makes Obama pay a political price for his linkage policy – a campaign that causes the Obama administration pain – I fear Judea and Samaria, and probably a united Jerusalem, may be lost.
I close with another quote from Caroline Glick. “As we have been all too often in our history, today Israel stands alone against our enemies. We can either defeat them, or we can be defeated. The choice is ours.”