Agudas Yisroel of America, in Federal Court depositions by experts on epidemiology and statistics, exposed the fraudulent data which Susan Blank and her friends at the CDC presented to bolster her case.
So seriously flawed was the City’s case against the Mohels, that liberal, secular Jewish Federal judge, Naomi Buchwald, had no choice but to reject it.
So much for honesty and objectivity at the CDC.
Unfortunately, all doctors, pediatricians included, are controlled by the CDC. They ignore the guidelines of the CDC and the NYC Department of health at their peril. If they step out of these guidelines, they may be open to an expensive and messy malpractice suit.
The only legal protection a doctor has is to follow the “standard of care,” as laid down by Government authorities.
WHO CONTROLS VACCINATION POLICY AT THE CDC?
So, now that we have some idea of how corrupt the CDC is, let’s see how they handle the question of vaccinations.
First, we have to understand that vaccines are a multibillion-dollar business for the large pharmaceutical firms, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis.
It is a captive business, guaranteed to grow, since vaccines are forced upon children by law. A school or a daycare center may not admit a child who has not been given the entire recommended vaccine schedule.
Let’s take a look at this “recommended schedule.”
By the time a baby is one year old, the CDC recommends that he receive 21 injections against 10 diseases (some injections are boosters for the same disease).
This, despite the fact that, during the first year of life, the baby is unable to mount an effective response to any disease, because a full-fledged immune reaction would damage the baby’s brain—God, in His wisdom, designed the baby’s body that way.
That means that the baby is unable to tailor the immune system—the TH1 white immune blood cells—to respond to a particular bacterium or virus.
Heather Zwickey, PhD, Immunology and Microbiology, Yale University, explains that this is why any vaccines that doctors give before 12 months of age must be given again after that time in order for the immune system to tailor the THI cells properly.
THE HEPATITIS-B SHOT AT BIRTH “ASININE, POTENTIALLY DEVASTATING”
One of the very worst vaccine abuses is the Hepatitis-B shot that is routinely given AT BIRTH. This vaccine is medically necessary only for the children of drug addicts, and, indeed, in most modern countries, this shot is given only when medically indicated.
“The Hepatitis B vaccine doesn’t make any medical sense,” says Dr. Larry Palevsky, a pediatrician in Long island. “Hepatitis has never been a disease prevalent in neonates (newborns)—Asinine, there’s no medical indication for it.”
Dr. Robert Sears, a famous pediatrician in California and author of The Vaccine Book, agrees that side effects of Hepatitis-B vaccination can be devastating to babies: high fever, diarrhea, loss of appetite, and prolonged hospital stays.
That’s what happened at Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Israel. The first year that Hepatitis-B was injected into newborns, in 1992, the number of newborns admitted into the Neonate Intensive Care Unit (NICU) was double the number of the previous year, when the vaccine was not given routinely.
More than fifty scientific studies in both humans and animals, in peer-reviewed medical journals, have revealed that Hepatitis-B vaccine can cause lupus as well as potentially-fatal Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) (a form of paralyses). It increases the risk of type-1 diabetes by 250% and can cause other autoimmune diseases.
In a study done at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, one group of rhesus monkeys got the Hepatitis-B shot, while a similar group did not. The monkeys who got the shot showed significant developmental delays, when compared with those who did not.
Given this information, why would anyone in his right mind recommend this shot for a newborn child?
HOW ABOUT AUTISM?
Pediatricians deny that there is any reliable research that demonstrates a link between vaccines and autism. Everything is blamed on a single doctor in England—Dr. Andrew Wakefield—who, it is claimed, single-handedly created panic among the British population by publishing a peer-reviewed article in the British medical journal The Lancet, proposing a possible link between the MMR shot and the explosive rise of autism, and recommending single shots only.