Photo Credit:
“However, if there is evidence that he received the equipment as a loan and people have seen it still in his hands, he has no alternative, winning claim,” concluded Rabbi Dayan. “He cannot claim he purchased the equipment initially, since there is a signed loan agreement, or that he already returned it, since people have seen it. Therefore, without the migo, he is not believed that he later bought the item. Rabbi Brown is considered the known owner of the equipment, so Rabbi Brenner must return it.” (C .M. 72:18; 90:13; 133:5)
Advertisement
