It is inconceivable that I would push a woman, let alone knock her to the ground, without all of the police officers in the area having seen such an event.
All of my tours on the Temple Mount are conducted with participants and Arab elements in place, and watched by police through fixed and mobile video security cameras. I was fully apparent and visible at the scene from four different angles. Anyone can see that I am the victim here — yet instead of reacting in self-defense, I turn and ask police in the area to distance the rioters.
Note also that in the first video you can see that even before I arrive on the scene, Arab men and women are present and waiting to attack me.
On another note, the woman who filed the complaint alleged in her testimony that she was terribly confused and there were many details that she did not remember. Only one thing she remembers clearly, she said — and that was the fact that the event was not filmed. In other words, the only way with absolute certainty that this is factual is if the event did not occur.
As further evidence of the truth of my testimony I submit to the court the results of a polygraph test which substantiates the fact that I was telling the truth 100 percent in my claim that I attacked no man or woman on the Temple Mount.
In light of the above it appears that the trial court erred when it deemed me to be a danger to others and erred also when deciding to hold me without trial, this jeopardizing my source of income, until the end of the court proceedings.
I ask the District Court to overturn the decision to issue a restraining order, and allow me a fair trial as to whether in fact the event actually took place, without carrying out the severe punishment of preventing me from ascending to the Temple Mount, until the end of the proceedings.