Photo Credit: Pixabay / Arek Socha
illustrative

(Israel Hayom via JNS) In a rare decision, an Israeli court has approved the marriage of two 17-year-olds. Judge Itay Karmi, presiding over the case, characterized his ruling as “the best possible decision under the current circumstances” after carefully weighing the complex factors at play.

The couple, who adhere to a religious lifestyle, petitioned the court for permission to marry after the girl became pregnant. Their legal counsel argued that marriage would benefit both individuals, shielding them from social embarrassment. The attorney emphasized the couple’s maturity and highlighted the support of their families.

Advertisement




However, the attorney general opposed the request, citing an assessment by an appointed social worker. The social worker’s report concluded that underage marriages generally do not serve minors’ best interests and should only be sanctioned in the most exceptional cases.

Despite this opposition, Karmi granted the couple’s request, citing the pregnancy as a crucial factor in his decision. “Given the present situation, the most appropriate course of action is to approve the … petition,” he stated.

He underscored the case’s complexity, distinguishing between a “good” decision and a “right” one. He noted that child marriages are typically viewed as an outdated practice that often prioritizes family interests over those of the children. Consequently, the judge emphasized that courts must exercise heightened scrutiny when evaluating such requests.

The judge stressed the importance of assessing each case individually, with a focus on the minors’ best interests. He stated that marriage should only be approved in exceptional circumstances when it’s clear the decision stems from free will without familial pressure and when allowing the marriage would better serve the minor’s interests than prohibiting it. Karmi determined that this particular case met these stringent criteria.

In his examination of the case, Karmi considered several key factors: the couple’s maturity, the quality of their relationship, their family dynamics and their socio-economic background. He also weighed the potential ramifications of denying the request, including the social and personal challenges associated with an out-of-wedlock pregnancy.

Originally published by Israel Hayom.


Share this article on WhatsApp:
Advertisement

SHARE
Previous articleRamaz High School Graduates Boycott Columbia, Many Prefer YU
Next articleState Attorney Recommends Criminal Investigation of Popular Singer Who Called for Eradicating Gaza