Categories: Israel / UK / The Courts / News Briefs

British PM Affirms Opposition to ICC War-Crimes Probe Against Israel

|

April 17, 2021, 8 PM ET

Print

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson recently announced the United Kingdom’s opposition to an International Criminal Court investigation into Israel for alleged war crimes. In an April 9 letter to the British lobby group Conservative Friends of Israel, he said while the government is one of the ICC’s “stronger supporters” and respects the independence of the court, it opposes the probe.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has confirmed UK’s opposition to ICC investigation, asserting it doesn’t have jurisdiction and gives impression of being "partial and prejudicial attack" on Israel.

CFI’s @SCrabbPembs @EricPickles & Lord Polak “strongly welcome” the confirmation? pic.twitter.com/6H0bO3pqxd
— CFoI (@CFoI) April 13, 2021

“We do not accept that the ICC has jurisdiction in this instance, given that Israel is not a party to the Statute of Rome and Palestine is not a sovereign state,” he wrote. “This investigation gives the impression of being a partial and prejudicial attack on a friend and ally of the U.K.’s.” The ICC announced in March that it would investigate possible war crimes committed by Israel and Palestinians, specifically related to “Operation Protective Edge” in the summer of 2014. The lobby group welcomed Johnson’s opposition to the investigation. “The investigation has rightly been condemned,” its leaders said in a statement. “As the prime minister states, the ICC does not have jurisdiction, and we support the U.K.’s decision to stand with Israel against the probe.” In response to Johnson’s comments, the Palestinian Authority’s mission in London said on Wednesday that his letter “marks a low point in U.K.-Palestine relations and undermines the U.K.’s credibility on the international stage.” “The letter is a contradiction of international law. It is a contradiction of British policy,” said the mission. “It subverts the rules-based global order. And it sets back efforts to secure a lasting and just peace in Palestine. … If Mr. Johnson disputes this, he disputes the legitimacy of the court.”