Categories: In Print / Halacha & Hashkafa
Is It Proper To Reject A Shidduch Candidate Because He Or She Is Sefardi While Your Family Is Ashkenazi Or Vice-Versa?
Is it proper to reject a shidduch candidate because he or she is Sefardi while your family is Ashkenazi or vice-versa?
Sefardim and Ashkenazim are a phenomenon of well over a thousand years. Even so, they are not vastly different. Just as Ashkenazim boast the mix of kohen, levi and yisrael, so do the Sefardim (think Spain, Portugal, Morrocco and the Mediteranean Basin, Turkey, Greece, and even Syria etc.), and so do the Mizrahi (think Iraq – Mesopotamia, Iran - Persia and further East). The Yemenites, who are distinct, nevertheless have all three categories as well. Thus, going back in history, we are all connected.
We find that when our people were about to enter the Land of Canaan and each tribe and each individual was to be apportioned their parcel of land, there arose the incident of the daughters of Tzelofechad (who had no sons but only these five daughters) who approached Moshe, in Parshas Pinchas, and said: “Our father died in the wilderness, and he not of those who challenged Hashem in the company of Korach, for he died for his own sin, but had no sons. Why shall his name be diminished [by not receiving his portion]? Give us a portion in the land among his brothers."
Moshe consults with Hashem, who transmits the law of inheritance that where there is no son, the daughter[s] inherit and thus receive a portion in the land. But they were told to marry within their tribe, and indeed they did do so. Here the Torah is clear that this was only for that specific time – the original apportioning of the land – in order that the portion due one tribe not be switched over to another tribe. In the end (maftir, Parshas Mas’ei) the daughters of Tzelofechad marry their cousins, thus ensuring the equity due their tribe. Otherwise, they would have been permitted to marry outside their tribe (Menashe).
We find later the terrible incident of Pilegesh b’Givah, (Shoftim chap. 19-21) whereby the tribes all vowed not to marry anyone from Benjamin. However, later on, when they realized that the entire tribe was on the verge of disappearing, they recanted their ban, and thus Benjamin flourished.
Another example of marriage across tribal lines is in the Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 10:13) where we find that Shimshon’s father Mano’ach was from the tribe of Dan and his mother Tzlilpones was from the tribe of Judah.
We thus see that there should be no difference regarding which community one comes from.
One caveat, though, is that a woman always follows her husband's minhagim (Responsa Tashbatz Vol.3: 179). Thus, an Ashkenazi woman married to a Sefardi man will be allowed to eat rice and other kitniyos on Pesach, while a Sefardi woman married to an Ashkenazi man will not be allowed to eat kitniyos on Pesach. Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef, zt’l, reasons that such is the case, with the exception that if they are guests in the home of the wife's parents then she may eat her rice.
I remember from my yeshiva days in the Mirrer Yeshiva that my Moroccan friends almost all married Ashkenazim, and no one found that to be a problem.
After we lost six million Kedoshim – holy souls – we need to rebuild Klal Yisrael, just as our forebears rebuilt the tribe of Benjamin. We need not place any additional impediments on young people as they seek to arrive at this important goal.
– Rabbi Yaakov Klass is Rav of K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush; Torah Editor of The Jewish Press; and Presidium Chairman, Rabbinical Alliance of America/Igud HaRabbonim. Email yklass@jewishpress.com
* * *

* * *



October 9, 2026 







