Categories: Not On Bread Alone / Torah / Parsha
Keys and Challahs

(The Jewish Press)
Shmini
In this week’s parsha we read about the death of Nadav and Avihu, the sons of Aharon, because they offered an "Eish Zara," a "foreign fire" (Vayikra10:1).
This is a very “apt” week to discuss this subject as it is the Shabbat after Pesach. On this specific Shabbat, certain communities, predominantly Chassidic, have a special custom of using a key (schlissel in Yiddish) challah for HaMotzi at the three meals. The custom varies somewhat, some braid the challah into the shape of a key, some cut a piece of dough in the shape of a key and stick it on top of a regular shaped challah and some insert an actual metal key into the challah before baking (wrapped in foil).
The origins of this custom are Kabbalistic, connected to the “Tirayin Petichin” – metaphoric gates in Heaven, that according to the Zohar HaKadosh, are opened at the start of Pesach and remain so until Pesach Sheini. HaKadosh Baruch Hu (through these gates, as it were) rains down abundance upon us. The Imrei Pinchas (b.1726) cites this as the reason for the custom of the “key” challah, to reflect the fact that these Tirayin Petichin are still open and this presents a unique opportunity to focus our prayers and to merit a positive response.
This theme is echoed by the Apter Rebbe (b. 1748) also known by the name of his famous sefer “Ohev Yisrael” and the Belzer Rebbe (b. 1781) in his sefer “Choshvei Machshavot.”
This custom has meticulously been observed by admorim and poskim from Belz, Satmar, Tzans, and numerous other Chassidic sects for centuries.
Recently, however, this custom has come under criticism by some, claiming that it originated in Christian rituals. Their assertion is that many keys in the ancient Christian world often took the form of a cross, and therefore baking a challah in this shape is unacceptable practice, even tantamount to idol worship ("Eish Zara")??
Since this is a subject close to my heart, I have researched in depth it for many years and have come to the conclusion that the claim that this custom falls under the category of "Eish Zara" is completely baseless and reliant on erroneous historical and halachic data.
The first question I would like to address is – “how do we classify an acceptable custom as opposed to an unacceptable one?” An acceptable or even commendable custom is one that:
- Does not add to, detract from or contradict, any halacha.
- Glorifies the halacha AND/OR addresses a specific circumstance
- Has some Tanach/Mishna/Talmud/Rishonim/Acharonim basis/reference


August 14, 2026 







