יום שלישי, 8 ספטמבר 2026Tuesday, September 8, 2026
Follow Us
יום שלישי, כ״ו אלול תשפ״וTuesday, September 8, 2026
Follow Us

Sections

siman

From the Paper / Halacha & Hashkafa

Modeh Bemiktzat Oath In The Case Of Partial Admission (Siman 75:4)

By Raphael Grunfeld

The security interest is equivalent to heilach, tendering payment of the debt, because it empowers the court to seize and sell the defendant’s land to cover the debt.

Halacha & Hashkafa

Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat (Siman 75:3) - Whether Litigants Must Specify Their Claims

By Raphael Grunfeld

If the creditor responds to this unsolicited admission by thanking the debtor for reminding him of the debt, the finder is still absolved from taking an oath.

Halacha & Hashkafa

Siman 75:2

By Raphael Grunfeld

The reason one witness supporting the defendant excuses him from taking the Modeh Bemiktzat oath of partial admission is based on the same logic that obliges him to take the oath when one witness testifies against him.

Halacha & Hashkafa

Siman 75 - Whether Litigants Must Specify Their Claims

By Raphael Grunfeld

Even if the litigant is sophisticated in matters of Jewish business law, he still must specify his pleadings.

Serials

Persuaded – Chapter III

By Barbara Bensoussan

View all
cross