Categories: Blogs
Google’s SEARCH Makes Antisemitism Go VIRAL
Google is the world’s leading search engine. Over 84% of search traffic across most of the free world originates from Google ( I know this because I googled it). But my own research shows that Google’s own search engine is helping to spread antisemitism into the mainstream. Here is the story:
The key returns that we see immediately are Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu. A reflection of money, power and in the mind of many, a reflection of ‘nasty’. Even the image of Gal Gadot links to an attack on Netanyahu. As far as I am aware, Donald Trump is not a quintessential example of a ‘Jewish person’. But it gets even worse. In just the first few results the connecting articles contain numerous attacks on Israel, Orthodoxy and Jewish people more generally. Even a Tony Greenstein article – which calls Israel a Jewish Supremacist State makes the cut.
Greenstein is an expelled Labour activist and a notorious antisemite.
To show this more thoroughly I analysed the ‘tone’ and ‘subject’ of the content of the article the image linked to. I looked at the top 30 hits. On a phone or normal sized computer screen this equates to scrolling down several times.
Results:
We instantly see that we are actually looking at a Muslim landscape. But there is also no image of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud or Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Nor is there Osama Bin Laden or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Gone are the politics and power, and all we can see are Muslims, the majority of images are of women, and all of the images look benign.
The difference becomes even more substantial when the articles attached to the images are opened. Gone are all the negative tones we found associated to the images of Jews:
What is in Google’s algorithm
Forget the maths that perhaps only Dr Sheldon Cooper can understand. Basically, when you type a query into Google – it uses several factors when deciding the optimal answer to your question. Your location, your interests, previous responses to the same question, and the popularity of a page are just four or the many variables. As long as it is not tampered with, Google’s algorithm reflects societal interest and bias back on itself. This is also true of its image search. If the conversations around beautiful women online are primarily centred on or around white women, then that will be the result of a search. The people behind Google do understand that the power it wields creates a social responsibility. They don’t want to reflect all societal bias back, because they understand that ranking some popular pages highly would promote many toxic worldviews. But this means that Google search does have an editorial policy. Google decides what is healthy and what is toxic. Google protects some groups from spreading the hate against them inadvertently or subliminally (in returning results not explicitly asked for) by demoting the ranking of offensive pages. Unfortunately, Google does not protect Jews in the same way. A big h/t to Lee Kern for alerting me to this issue (Lee’s Twitter and IG). (NOTE: an incognito window was used throughout, to avoid Google ‘filtering’ a bubble around my results, previous search history was deleted, cookies were cleaned, and search customisation was optimised to offset additional bias. Only geographical bias was not addressed as this is not relevant to the research)Typing ‘Jewish People’ into Google
A simple exercise. Type ‘Jewish people’ into Google. The results are clean and relevant. There is clearly an editorial policy of some type at work, because ‘Jews did 9/11’ and other popular antisemitic conspiracy is nowhere to be seen (unless Google recognises you want to see that kind of stuff from your antisemitic activity). Whilst the actual text results seem to be normal, click in the menu bar to see the result of the ‘images search’. It will look something like this:
The key returns that we see immediately are Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu. A reflection of money, power and in the mind of many, a reflection of ‘nasty’. Even the image of Gal Gadot links to an attack on Netanyahu. As far as I am aware, Donald Trump is not a quintessential example of a ‘Jewish person’. But it gets even worse. In just the first few results the connecting articles contain numerous attacks on Israel, Orthodoxy and Jewish people more generally. Even a Tony Greenstein article – which calls Israel a Jewish Supremacist State makes the cut.
Greenstein is an expelled Labour activist and a notorious antisemite.
To show this more thoroughly I analysed the ‘tone’ and ‘subject’ of the content of the article the image linked to. I looked at the top 30 hits. On a phone or normal sized computer screen this equates to scrolling down several times.
Results:
- Articles about Trump – 9
- Articles about Bibi – 4 (including the Gal Gadot attack on Bibi)
- Negative article about power of Rabbinate in Israel
- Article about the arguments over the definition of the word ‘Jew’ in Germany
- Article about antisemitism – 5
- Politically loaded article about the Jewish population of the UK
- Article about both Jewish and Muslim opinions
- Article about how toxic Israel is for the Jewish people
- Pew research on Jews in America
- Article about Jewish Hairstyles in a Jewish paper
- Article saying anti-Jewish racism is not really racism
- Tony Greenstein article about Israel being a Jewish supremacist state
- Article about a Jewish Rabbi in Japan
- Article about Jews being a race
- Article about Israel banning Democratic U.S. congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar
Typing ‘Muslim people’ into Google
Now try the same exercise with ‘Muslim people’. And we immediately see that we are facing an entirely different type of result:
We instantly see that we are actually looking at a Muslim landscape. But there is also no image of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud or Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Nor is there Osama Bin Laden or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Gone are the politics and power, and all we can see are Muslims, the majority of images are of women, and all of the images look benign.
The difference becomes even more substantial when the articles attached to the images are opened. Gone are all the negative tones we found associated to the images of Jews:
- Pew article on US Muslims
- Academic article about perceptions of Muslims (written by Palestinian Muslim)
- Article about anti-Muslim bigotry and the difficulty of being a Muslim in the US
- Article about how the niqab is becoming more acceptable
- NYT article explaining the wonders of Sufi Muslims
- Article about how a politician who hated Muslims, can change his opinion of them
- An article emphasising the diversity of thought amongst Muslims about Islamic law
- An article looking at Muslims in Sri Lanka
- Self-Care Tips Every Muslim Should Keep
- An article about the sale of data in a Muslim focused app (neutral)
- Pew research – how learning about Islam helps create positive views of Muslims
- How Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric helped unite America against him
- How more books should be written by young Muslims
- Speaking to American Muslims about the bigotry they face
- About building theological bridges between Christianity and Islam
- How Islam will soon be the world’s largest religion
- About the ban on some Islamic dress worn in Kazakhstan
- About Muslims protesting France’s crackdowns on Islam
- About how to counter Hindu bigotry against Muslims
- An argument about Islamist extremism
- About building bridges with Muslim communities in the US
- How Islam’s roots in America go back to the Founding Fathers
- About the size of the world’s Muslim population
- About the difficulty of running for office in the US as a Muslim
- About how most people accept Muslims but aren’t sure on Islam
- An article on Nepal’s Muslims ‘stepping out of the shadows’
- About attacks on a Muslim community in NYC
- An article about a Muslim woman who hates Islamist terrorists.
- About how Muslims prepare for Ramadan
- An article about a queer Muslim’s pilgrimage to Mecca











